Volume 2, Issue 4 (Summer 2017 -- 2017)                   hdq 2017, 2(4): 165-178 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Roudini J, Khankeh H R, Witruk E, Ebadi A, Reschke K, Stück M. Community Mental Health Preparedness in Disasters: A Qualitative Content Analysis in an Iranian Context. hdq. 2017; 2 (4) :165-178
URL: http://hdq.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-129-en.html
1- Master Degree Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Biosciences, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
2- PhD Research Center in Emergency and Disaster Health, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran. , hamid.khankeh@ki.se
3- Habilitation Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
4- Doctor Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Faculty of Nursing, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (843 Views)

Background: Disasters are stressful events not only for individuals who suffer from personal loss but also for the community at large. It seems necessary to study the mental health of the community in disaster situations so as to endorse their health, care planning and prevent disorders. A pure understanding of the community mental health preparedness, based on the experiences and perceptions of involved people is necessary in order to attain this aim. The purpose of this article is to put forth a subjective and comprehensive description of community mental health preparedness in disasters.
Materials and Methods: A qualitative inductive content analysis method was exploited since community mental health preparedness is a subjective, context bond and complex phenomenon, which is better described based on in-depth experience and perceptions of involved people. The study consisted of 14 participants including experts and lay people. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews. All interviews were transcribed and data analysis was accomplished based on qualitative inductive content analysis principles.
Results: From the analysis of the data content, 5 themes were explored including 1) Cultural values and beliefs; 2) Risk beliefs; 3) Mental preparedness in disasters; 4) Psychological process; 5) Trust.
Conclusion: Mental health preparedness is a multifactorial phenomenon that requires a clear understanding and definition of perceived threats, public trust on social structure and formal and informal supportive organization. This preparedness involves proportional, mental, social, familial, religious beliefs, and cultural sensitivity along with the ability to handle mentally disastrous situation, which can be measured after concept analysis and tool development process.

Full-Text [PDF 521 kb]   (281 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (96 Views)  
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2017/02/14 | Accepted: 2017/05/22 | Published: 2017/07/1

1. World Health Organization. Health services must stop leaving older people behind. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.
2. Graham J. The emotional aftermath of Hurricane Sandy. New York: New York Times. 2012 Nov 10.
3. Norris FH, Perilla JL, Riad JK, Kaniasty K, Lavizzo EA. Stability and change in stress, resources, and psychological distress following natural disaster: Findings from hurricane Andrew. Anxiety, Stress & Coping. 1999; 12(4):363–96. doi: 10.1080/10615809908249317 [DOI:10.1080/10615809908249317]
4. Bonde JP, Utzon-Frank N, Bertelsen M, Borritz M, Eller NH, Nordentoft M, et al. Risk of depressive disorder following disasters and military deployment: Systematic review with meta-analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2016; 208(4):330–6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.157859 [DOI:10.1192/bjp.bp.114.157859]
5. Bertolote J. The roots of the concept of mental health. World Psychiatry. 2008; 7(2):113–6. doi: 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2008.tb00172.x [DOI:10.1002/j.2051-5545.2008.tb00172.x]
6. Krug EG, Kresnow M, Peddicord JP, Dahlberg LL, Powell KE, Crosby AE, et al. Suicide after Natural Disasters. New England Journal of Medicine. 1998; 338(6):373–8. doi: 10.1056/nejm199802053380607 [DOI:10.1056/NEJM199802053380607]
7. Norris FH, Friedman MJ, Watson PJ. 60,000 Disaster victims speak; Part II: Summary and implications of the disaster mental health research. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes. 2002; 65(3):240–60. doi: 10.1521/psyc. [DOI:10.1521/psyc.]
8. Udomratn P. Mental health and the psychosocial consequences of natural disasters in Asia. International Review of Psychiatry. 2008; 20(5):441–4. doi: 10.1080/09540260802397487 [DOI:10.1080/09540260802397487]
9. Sharma R, Kumar V, Raja D. Disaster preparedness amongst women, the invisible force of resilience: A study from Delhi, India. International Journal of Health System and Disaster Management. 2015; 3(3):163. doi: 10.4103/2347-9019.157402 [DOI:10.4103/2347-9019.157402]
10. Black D. Children and disaster. BMJ. 1982; 285(6347):989–90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.285.6347.989 [DOI:10.1136/bmj.285.6347.989]
11. Schonfeld DJ, Gurwitch RH. Addressing disaster mental health needs of children: Practical guidance for pediatric emergency health care providers. Clinical Pediatric Emergency Medicine. 2009; 10(3):208–15. doi: 10.1016/j.cpem.2009.06.002 [DOI:10.1016/j.cpem.2009.06.002]
12. Merchant A. Children and disaster education: An analysis of disaster risk reduction within the school curricula of oregon, Texas, and the Philippines [MA thesis]. Portland: Concordia University; 2015.
13. Khankeh HR, Khorasani-Zavareh D, Johanson E, Mohammadi R, Ahmadi F, Mohammadi R. Disaster health related challenges and requirements: A grounded theory study in Iran. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine. 2011; 26(3):151–8. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x11006200 [DOI:10.1017/S1049023X11006200]
14. Davidson JR, McFarlane AC. The extent and impact of mental health problems after disaster. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2006; 67(suppl 2):9-14. PMID: 16602810 [PMID]
15. Meredith LS, Eisenman DP, Tanielian T, Taylor SL, Basurto-Davila R, Zazzali J, et al. Prioritizing "psychological" consequences for disaster preparedness and response: A framework for addressing the emotional, behavioral, and cognitive effects of patient surge in large scale disasters. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness. 2011; 5(01):73–80. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2010.47 [DOI:10.1001/dmp.2010.47]
16. Pfefferbaum B, North CS. Assessing children's disaster reactions and mental health needs: screening and clinical evaluation. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 2013; 58(3):135-42. doi: 10.1177/070674371305800303 [DOI:10.1177/070674371305800303]
17. Herrman H, Jané-Llopis E. The status of mental health promotion. Public Health Reviews. 2012; 34(2). doi: 10.1007/bf03391674 [DOI:10.1007/BF03391674]
18. Friedli L, World Health Organization. Mental health, resilience and inequalities. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2009. [PMCID]
19. Patel V, Flisher AJ, Hetrick S, McGorry P. Mental health of young people: A global public-health challenge. The Lancet. 2007; 369(9569):1302–13. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60368-7 [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60368-7]
20. Ranjbar M, Khankeh H, Khorasani Zavareh D, Zargham-Boroujeni A, Johansson E. Challenges in conducting qualitative research in health: A conceptual paper. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research. 2015; 20(6):635. doi: 10.4103/1735-9066.170010 [DOI:10.4103/1735-9066.170010]
21. Graneheim U, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today. 2004; 24(2):105–12. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001 [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001]
22. Polit DF, Hungler BP. Nursing research: Principles and methods. New York: Lippincott; 1999. [PMID]
23. Faure MG. Financial compensation for victims of catastrophes: A law and economics perspective. Law & Policy. 2007; 29(3):339–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2007.00258.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9930.2007.00258.x]
24. Cameron L, Shah M. Risk taking behavior in the wake of natural disasters. Journal of Human Resources. 2015; 50(2):484–515. doi: 10.3368/jhr.50.2.484 [DOI:10.3368/jhr.50.2.484]
25. Cook KS, Yamagishi T, Cheshire C, Cooper R, Matsuda M, Mashima R. Trust building via risk taking: A cross societal experiment. Social Psychology Quarterly. 2005; 68(2):121–42. doi: 10.1177/019027250506800202 [DOI:10.1177/019027250506800202]
26. Czajkowski J. Is it time to go yet? Understanding household hurricane evacuation decisions from a dynamic perspective. Natural Hazards Review. 2011; 12(2):72–84. doi: 10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000037 [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000037]
27. Dussaillant F, Guzmán E. Trust via disasters: The case of Chile's 2010 earthquake. Disasters. 2014; 38(4):808-32. doi: 10.1111/disa.12077 [DOI:10.1111/disa.12077]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
Write the security code in the box

Send email to the article author

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb