Volume 2, Issue 4 (Summer 2017 -- 2017)                   hdq 2017, 2(4): 187-200 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Saei A, Rahimi A. Collaboration of Patients With Mobility Disabilities in Caring: Conceptual Analysis. hdq. 2017; 2 (4) :187-200
URL: http://hdq.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-148-en.html
1- PhD Department of Medical Surgery, Faculty of Nursing, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. , azam.saei@gmail.com
2- Department of Medical Surgery, Faculty of Nursing, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (749 Views)

Background: Collaboration of patients in caring is regarded as a gold standard in professional care associated with modern nursing. Considering the complexity of the concept, it is imperative to analyze caring of patients with motor disability caused by traffic accidents.
Materials and Methods: This is a qualitative study to analyze the concept of collaboration in caring for traffic casualties using a hybrid model in three stages. In the first stage, to conduct a systemic review, a literature search was performed using databases such as Blackwell, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Elsevier with the keywords: Collaboration in caring and orthopedic victims of traffic accidents. The literature search resulted in 110 related reviews up to 2016. In the second stage or field stage, for the importance of collaboration in caring for traffic casualties, 7 traffic victims and 3 nurses were interviewed and data were analyzed by content analysis. Finally, in the third stage, an overall analysis was performed according to the findings in previous stages.
Results: Combining the results of reviews and findings of field study, we obtained 87 codes, 14 subcategories, and 5 categories (“organizational factors in sharing information and knowledge”, “promoting a sense of responsibility in patient”, “patient empowerment for health promotion”, “mutual trust”, and “hypersensitivity to active engagement to return to normal life”) in content analysis.
Conclusion: Recognizing the concept of collaboration of patient with motor disability in caring from the orthopedic viewpoint, managers and nurses will be able to plan and execute management and educational activities according to the insight obtained from scientific findings to provide suitable conditions in this regard.

Full-Text [PDF 532 kb]   (258 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (87 Views)  
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2017/03/17 | Accepted: 2017/06/1 | Published: 2017/07/1

1. World Health Organization. Global status report on road safety 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015
2. Afzali S, Saleh A, Seif Rabiei MA, Taheri K. Frequency of alcohol and substance abuse observed in drivers killed in traffic accidents in Hamadan, Iran. Archives of Iranian Medicine. 2013; 16(4):240-2. doi: 013164/AIM.0010.
3. Haghparast-Bidgoli H, Khanke H, Jahansson E, Yarmohammadian MH, Hasselberg M. Exploring the provision of hospital trauma care for road traffic injury victims in Iran: a qualitative approach. Journal of Injury and Violence Research. 2013; 5(1):28–37. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v5i1.195 [DOI:10.5249/jivr.v5i1.195]
4. Bakhtiyari M, Delpisheh A, Monfared AB, Kazemi-Galougahi MH, Mehmandar MR, Riahi M, et al. The road traffic crashes as a neglected public health concern; an observational study from Iranian population. Traffic Injury Prevention. 2015; 16(1):36-41. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.898182 [DOI:10.1080/15389588.2014.898182]
5. Finkelstein EA, Corso PS, Miller TR. The incidence and economic burden of injuries in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. [DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179484.001.0001]
6. Unicef. Road Traffic Injuries in Iran and their Prevention. A Worrying Picture [Internet]. 2012 [Updated 2012 August 12] Available from: https://www.unicef.org/iran/media_4783.html
7. World Health Organization. Violence and Injury Prevention and Disability (VIP); Road traffic injuries [Internet]. 2012 [Updated 2012 November 27]. Available from: http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/road_traffic/en/
8. Marshall SS, Haywood KL, Fitzpatrick R. Patient involvement and collaboration in shared decisionmaking: A review. Oxford: University of Oxford; 2005.
9. Cahill J. Patient participation - a review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 1998; 7(2):119–28. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.1998.00132.x [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2702.1998.00132.x]
10. Millard L, Hallett C, Luker K. Nurse-patient interaction and decision-making in care: patient involvement in community nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2006; 55(2):142–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03904.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03904.x]
11. Soberg HL, Bautz-Holter E, Roise O, Finset A. Long-term multidimensional functional consequences of severe multiple injuries two years after trauma: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 2007; 62(2):461–70. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000222916.30253.ea [DOI:10.1097/01.ta.0000222916.30253.ea]
12. Patistea E, Siamanta H. A literature review of patients' compared with nurses' perceptions of caring: Implications for practice and research. Journal of Professional Nursing. 1999; 15(5):302-12. doi: 10.1016/s8755-7223(99)80056-8 [DOI:10.1016/S8755-7223(99)80056-8]
13. Sahlsten MJ, Larsson IE, Sjöström B, Plos KA. An analysis of the concept of patient participation. Nursing Forum. 2008; 43(1):2-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6198.2008.00090.x. [DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6198.2008.00090.x]
14. Russell AN. How individuals with traumatic injuries manage their lives following a motor vehicle accident crash [PhD thesis]. Kent: Kent State University; 2008.
15. Eldh AC, Ehnfors M, Ekman I. The phenomena of participation and non-participation in health care -experiences of patients attending a nurse-led clinic for chronic heart failure. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2004; 3(3):239–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2004.05.001 [DOI:10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2004.05.001]
16. Tutton EMM. Patient participation on a ward for frail older people. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2005; 50(2):143–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03373.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03373.x]
17. Eldh AC, Ekman I, Ehnfors M. Conditions for patient participation and non-participation in health care. Nursing Ethics. 2006; 13(5):503-14. doi: 10.1191/0969733006nej898oa [DOI:10.1191/0969733006nej898oa]
18. Efraimsson E, Sandman PO, Hyden LC, Rasmussen BH. Discharge planning: "fooling ourselves?"--patient participation in conferences. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2004; 13(5):562-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.00900.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.00900.x]
19. Parker JM. The art & science of nursing. In: Daly J, Speedy S, Jackson D, editors. Context of Nursing: An Introduction. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2000.
20. Daly J, Speedy S, Jackson D, Lambert V, Lambert C. Professional nursing: Concepts, issues and challenges. New York: Speringer; 2005.
21. Schwartz-Barcott, D, Kim HS. An expansion and elaboration of Hybrid model of concept development. In: Rodgers BL, Knafl KA, editors. Concept Development in Nursing: Foundation, Techniques, and Application. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 2000.
22. Salsali M, Mohammadpoor A, Fakhrmovahedi A. The methods of concept development. Tehran: Tohfe–Boshra Publication; 2006
23. Rafii F, Soleimani M, Seyed-Fatemi N. [Concept analysis of participation of patient with chronic disease: use of hybrid model (Persian)]. Iran Journal of Nursing. 2010; 23(67):35-48
24. Doss S, DePascal P, Hadley K. Patient nurse partnership. Nephrology Nursing Journal. 2011; 38(2):115-125. PMID: 21520690 [PMID]
25. Gaboury I, Bujold M, Boon H, Moher D. Interprofessional collaboration within Canadian integrative healthcare clinics: Key components. Social Science & Medicine. 2009; 69(5):707-15. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.048 [DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.048]
26. Cahill J. Patient participation: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1996; 24(3):561–71. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.22517.x [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.22517.x]
27. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) [Internet] 2003 [Updated 2003 September 12] Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/
28. Biley FC. Treatment and care: Patient participation in decision making. Senior Nurse. 1989; 9(10):23-24
29. Biley FC. Some determinants that effect patient participation in decision making about nurse care. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1992; 17(4):414–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01924.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01924.x]
30. Ashworth PD, Longmate MA, Morrison P. Patient participation: Its meaning and significance in the context of caring. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1992; 17(12):1430-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb02814.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb02814.x]
31. Jewell SE. Patient participation: What does it mean to nurses? Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1994; 19(3):433-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01104.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01104.x]
32. Flynn MB, McKeever JL, Spada T, Gordon-Garofalo V. Active client participation: An examination of self-empowerment in HIV/AIDS case management with women. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care. 2000; 11(3):59-68.doi: 10.1016/s1055-3290(06)60276-8 [DOI:10.1016/S1055-3290(06)60276-8]
33. Cagle, CS. Practitioners' actions inhibited patient participation in self care decision making. Evidence-Based Nursing. 2002; 5(2):62. doi: 10.1136/ebn.5.2.62 [DOI:10.1136/ebn.5.2.62]
34. Wellard S, Lillibridge J, Beanland C, Lewis M. Consumer participation in acute care settings: An Australian experience. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 2003; 9(4):255–60. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-172x.2003.00429.x [DOI:10.1046/j.1440-172X.2003.00429.x]
35. Sahlsten MJM, Larsson IE, Sjöström B, Plos KAE. An analysis of the concept of patient participation. Nursing Forum. 2008; 43(1):2–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6198.2008.00090.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6198.2008.00090.x]
36. Doherty C, Doherty W. Patients' preferences for involvement in clinical decision-making within secondary care and the factors that influence their preferences. Journal of Nursing Management. 2005; 13(2):119-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2934.2004.00498.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2934.2004.00498.x]
37. Pryor J, Buzio A. Enhancing inpatient rehabilitation through the engagement of patients and nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 66(5):978–987. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05237.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05237.x]
38. Ohare MA, Walls L, Murphy GC. Social support Paris predict daily functioning following traumatic spinal cord injury: An exploratory study. The Open Rehabilitation Journal. 2011; 4(1):51-58. doi: 10.2174/1874943701104010051 [DOI:10.2174/1874943701104010051]
39. Kneafsey, R. An Exploratoration of the contribution of nurses and care assistants to patients' mobility rehabilitation [PhD thesis]. Birmingham: University of Birmingham; 2012
40. Franzén C, Björnstig U, Jansson L. Injured in traffic: Experiences of care and rehabilitation. Accident and Emergency Nursing. 2006; 14(2):104–10. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2006.01.003 [DOI:10.1016/j.aaen.2006.01.003]
41. McKinley S, Nagy S, Stein-Parbury J, Bramwell M, Hudson J. Vulnerability and security in seriously ill patients in intensive care. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 2002; 18(1):27–36. doi: 10.1054/iccn.2002.1611 [DOI:10.1054/iccn.2002.1611]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
Write the security code in the box

Send email to the article author

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb