Volume 3, Issue 1 (Autumn 2017 -- 2017)                   hdq 2017, 3(1): 39-50 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

1- Department of Social Work, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Preschool, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran. , siyamak.tahmasebi@gmail.com
3- Iran Association of Social Workers, Tehran, Iran.
4- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
5- Research Center for Psychiatry and Behavior Science, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
6- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
7- Country Coordinating Mechanism Committee, The Global Fund, Tehran, Iran.
8- Department of Traffic Safety, Faculty of Guidance and Driving Sciences, Amin Police University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (1451 Views)
Background: Driving accidents are among the most important causes of mortality in the world in recent years. In Iran, especially in major cities such as Tehran, this issue has become a prevalent social problem. More importantly, adolescents and young people constitute the majority of the victims of traffic accidents. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the psychosocial dimensions affecting high risk driving behaviors in adolescents in the age group between 12 to 17 years, in the city of Tehran.
Materials and Methods: The present study has taken a quantitative (correlation) approach by selecting a sample of 537 adolescents aged between 12 to 17 years and the psychosocial factors affecting high risk driving behaviors were assessed. The samples were selected by a Stratified-cluster method from the insurance company, hospitals and education correctional centers.
Results: Our study demonstrate that among psychological factors, three determinants, namely national religious identity, attitude toward laws and rules, and aggression were able to predict high risk behaviors in boys group with coefficient of B, 0.24, and 0.16, respectively; while the strongest predictor of high risk behavior is national religious identity. On the other hand, in the girls’ group, two factors, namely autocratic parenting and attitude toward law and rules were able to predict high risk behaviors with coefficients of B, 0.19, and 0.18, respectively; while the strongest predictor was the autocratic style of parenting. Among social factors, our findings show that participation in the plan to cooperate with traffic police with coefficients of Beta 0.26 and 0.21, respectively, is the strongest predictor of high risk behavior in adolescent boys and girls. 
Conclusion: Among predictor variables aggression, law breaking behavior, and national religious identity can better predict driving accidents, attitude toward law, and high risk behaviors. Aggression, attitude, and law breaking behavior are considered as abnormal behaviors that lead to legal problems, delinquencies, substance abuse and other destructive behaviors among adolescents and consequently cause damage, injury and disabilities in themselves and others. Moreover, involvement in aggressive behaviors can play a critical role in creating and exacerbating new behavioral problems in adolescents, and those problems are carried over immutably at the later stages of their life.
Full-Text [PDF 632 kb]   (284 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (155 Views)  
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2017/05/11 | Accepted: 2017/07/24 | Published: 2017/10/1

1. Sanaeinasab, Hormoz. Irani, Ghodratullah. Rafati, Shaldehi, Hassan. Karimi, Ali Akbar. [Investigating frequency and factors affecting driving accidents at a military center in Tehran (Persian)]. Pazhoohesh-ha-ye Modiriat-e Entezami. 2009; 4(1):19-30
2. World Health Organization. Global status report on road safety 2013: supporting a decade of action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
3. Office of Infrastructural Studies in Islamic Parliament Research Center. [Fatalities caused by driving accidents on the roads of Iran. Thematic code 250 (Persian)]. Tehran: Islamic Parliament Research Center; 2013.
4. Moradi S, Khademi A, Javartani M. [Victims of traffic accidents in the decade 2001-2010 in Iran, from the point of view of statistics (Persian)]. Tehran: Legal Medicine Research Center; 2012.
5. Deery HA. Hazard and risk perception among young novice drivers. Journal of Safety Research. 1999; 30(4):225–36. doi: 10.1016/s0022-4375(99)00018-3 [DOI:10.1016/S0022-4375(99)00018-3]
6. Norris FH, Matthews BA, Riad JK. Characterological, situational, and behavioral risk factors for motor vehicle accidents: a prospective examination. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2000; 32(4):505–15. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00068-8 [DOI:10.1016/S0001-4575(99)00068-8]
7. Legal Medicine Research Center. [Number of deaths among young people due to driving accidents (Persian)]. Tehran: Legal Medicine Research Center; 2014.
8. Masoudi Farid H. [Women and social violence (Persian)]. Paper presented at: The Conference on Women in the Path of Development With Emphasis on the Sixth Development Plan; 2014 January 26; Tehran, Iran.
9. Esfandiari, Gh (1995). [Studying the parenting practices of mothers of children with behavioral disorders and mothers of normal children and the effect of mothers' education on behavioral disorders in children (Persian)]. [MSc. thesis]. Tehran: Iran University of Medical Sciences.
10. Hajati FS, Akbarzadeh N, Khosravi Z. [The effect of education of the combined program of cognitive-behavioral therapy with positive approach on prevention of adolescents' violence in the city of Tehran (Persian)]. Quarterly Journal of Psychological Studies. 2008; 4(3):35-56.
11. Haghayegh A, Oreyzi HR. [Relation of aggression types according to Karen Horney's theory with negative and positive driving behaviors and accidents (Persian)]. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. 2009; 15(1):81-85.
12. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991; 50(2):179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t [DOI:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T]
13. Shope JT, Bingham CR. Teen driving: Motor-vehicle crashes and factors that contribute. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2008; 35(3):261–71. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.06.022 [DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.06.022]
14. Morrongiello BA, Lasenby-Lessard J. Psychological determinants of risk taking by children: An integrative model and implications for interventions. Injury Prevention. BMJ; 2007; 13(1):20–5. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.011296 [DOI:10.1136/ip.2005.011296]
15. Yazdkhasti F, Oreyzi H. Standardization of Child, Parent and Teacher's Forms of Child Behavior Checklist in the City of Isfahan (Persian)]. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. 2011; 17(1):60-70
16. Baumrind D. The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. The Journal of Early Adolescence. SAGE Publications; 1991; 11(1):56–95. doi: 10.1177/0272431691111004 [DOI:10.1177/0272431691111004]
17. Buri JR. Parental Authority Questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment. Informa UK Limited; 1991 Aug; 57(1):110–9. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5701_13 [DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa5701_13]
18. Epstein NB, Baldwin LM, Bishop DS. The McMaster family assessment device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 1983; 9(2):171–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1983.tb01497.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1983.tb01497.x]
19. Nasr-Esfahani N, Etemadi A, Shafi Abadi A. [The effectiveness of meaning-centered training on family functioning of married women (Persian)]. Semi-Annual Journal of Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2012; 2(2):209-221.
20. Rahiminezhad A. [Ayzenk Standardization of Adolescents Personality Questionnaire for Tehran Students 12-18 years of age Persian)]. Tehran: Ministry of Education Office of Counseling and Planning; 1993.
21. Coopersmith, S. The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman; 1967.
22. Seifi Gandomani MY, Shaghaghi F, Kalantari Mobeidi S. [The effectiveness of program of philosophy education on girl students, on their self esteem and their ability to solve problems (Persian)]. Quarterly Journal of Applied Psychology. 2011; 2(18):66-83.
23. Suri H, Einy E, Montazeri A, Omidvari S, Jahangiri A, Shiran Gh. [The role of assistants traffic police on rate of traffic violations and accidents (Persian)]. Payesh. 2010; 9(4):339-348.
24. Shinar D, Tractinsky N, Compton R. Effects of practice, age, and task demands, on interference from a phone task while driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2005; 37:315–326. PMID: 15667818 [DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2004.09.007] [PMID]
25. Moskal A, Martin JL, Laumon B. Risk factors for injury accidents among moped and motorcycle riders. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2012; 49:5–11. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.08.021 [DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2010.08.021]
26. Parker D, Lajunen T, Summala H. Anger and aggression among drivers in three European countries. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2002; 34(2):229–35. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(01)00018-5 [DOI:10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00018-5]
27. Shakerinia I, Mohammadpoor M. [Relationship between psychological characteristics mental health, aggression and driving habits in dangerous drivers (Persian)]. Journal of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences. 2010; 18(3):225-233
28. Hossein Javadi SM, Fekr Azad H, Tahmasebi S, Rafiei H, Rahgozar M, Tajlili A. Study of sycho-social factors affecting traffic accidents among young boys in Tehran. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. 2015; 17(7). doi: 10.5812/ircmj.22080v2 [DOI:10.5812/ircmj.22080v2]
29. Javadi SMH, Tahmasebi S, Azari-Arghun T, Arshi M, Alipour F, et al. The youth and experience of traffic accidents (Grounded theory). Health in Emergencies and Disasters Quarterly. 2017; 2(2):79–88. doi: 10.18869/nrip.hdq.2.2.79 [DOI:10.18869/nrip.hdq.2.2.79]
30. Sümer N. Personality and behavioral predictors of traffic accidents: testing a contextual mediated model. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2003; 35(6):949–64. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00103-3 [DOI:10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00103-3]