Volume 4, Issue 1 (Autumn 2018)
Health in Emergencies and Disasters Quarterly 2018, 4(1): 5-14 |
Back to browse issues page
1- Research Center in Emergency & Disaster Health, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran. , daddoust@yahoo.com
2- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
3- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
4- Iranian Research Center on Ageing, Faculty of Ageing, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
5- Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
6- Advanced Disaster, Emergency and Rapid-response Simulation, York University, Toronto, Canada.
2- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
3- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
4- Iranian Research Center on Ageing, Faculty of Ageing, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
5- Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
6- Advanced Disaster, Emergency and Rapid-response Simulation, York University, Toronto, Canada.
Abstract: (6890 Views)
Background: Determining social vulnerability of elderly people is a prerequisite for risk analysis in natural disasters. Understanding and comprehension of different dimensions of elderly social vulnerability by using international experiences is a must to determine and ultimately measure this phenomenon. In this study, we tried to understand the dimensions of elderly social vulnerability in natural disasters based on international experiences.
Materials and Methods: An integrative review of literature was conducted to clarify the elderly social vulnerability concept in natural disasters. We used keywords such as “elderly”, “social vulnerability”, and “natural disasters” in texts and titles in electronic databases of Medlib ،Iran Medex, Magiran, SID, Irandoc, Web of Science, Google Scholar CINAHL, ProQuest, Ovid, Ageline, Scopus, Embase, and Pub Med. At last 25 articles were found issued from 1986 to 2018. Their inclusion criteria were written in Persian or English language and had search keywords in their texts, titles, or and keywords. Commentary or editor letters were excluded. Each article was examined according to subjects, definition of social vulnerability, theoretical aspects, outcomes and antecedents of social vulnerability. For analyzing, controversial content analyses was used.
Results: The results of the concept analysis showed that social vulnerability is a complex, dynamic, challenging, multi-dimensional and pre-existing condition that is dependent on individual characteristics as well as economic status. It is influenced by the culture and elderly people’s place of living.
Conclusion: Reducing social vulnerability of older adults in natural disasters is not possible without paying enough attention to this issue and increasing their empowerment. Therefore, extensive research to identify this concept in related contexts and carry out qualitative research will be very effective in defining this concept and providing the appropriate tools for its measurement.
Materials and Methods: An integrative review of literature was conducted to clarify the elderly social vulnerability concept in natural disasters. We used keywords such as “elderly”, “social vulnerability”, and “natural disasters” in texts and titles in electronic databases of Medlib ،Iran Medex, Magiran, SID, Irandoc, Web of Science, Google Scholar CINAHL, ProQuest, Ovid, Ageline, Scopus, Embase, and Pub Med. At last 25 articles were found issued from 1986 to 2018. Their inclusion criteria were written in Persian or English language and had search keywords in their texts, titles, or and keywords. Commentary or editor letters were excluded. Each article was examined according to subjects, definition of social vulnerability, theoretical aspects, outcomes and antecedents of social vulnerability. For analyzing, controversial content analyses was used.
Results: The results of the concept analysis showed that social vulnerability is a complex, dynamic, challenging, multi-dimensional and pre-existing condition that is dependent on individual characteristics as well as economic status. It is influenced by the culture and elderly people’s place of living.
Conclusion: Reducing social vulnerability of older adults in natural disasters is not possible without paying enough attention to this issue and increasing their empowerment. Therefore, extensive research to identify this concept in related contexts and carry out qualitative research will be very effective in defining this concept and providing the appropriate tools for its measurement.
Type of Study: Review |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2018/04/20 | Accepted: 2018/08/20 | Published: 2018/10/1
Received: 2018/04/20 | Accepted: 2018/08/20 | Published: 2018/10/1
References
1. Khankeh HR, et al. Disaster hospital planing. National Plan. Tehran: University of Social Wellfare and Rehabilitation Sciences; 2012.
2. Thomas DS, Phillips BD, Lovekamp WE, Fothergill A. Social vulnerability to disasters. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2013.
3. Guha-Sapir D, Hoyois P, Below R. Annual disaster statistical review 2013. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED). Brussels, Belgium: Université catholique de Louvain; 2012.
4. Nature. The IUCN Programme 2013–2016 [Internet]. 2012 [Updated 2012 September 4]. Available from: https://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/iucn_programme_2013_2016.pdf
5. Tourani S, Behzadifar M, Martini M, Aryankhesal A, Mirghaed MT, Salemi M, et al. Health-related quality of life among healthy elderly Iranians: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2018; 16(1):18. [DOI:10.1186/s12955-018-0845-7] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1186/s12955-018-0845-7]
6. Chau PH, Gusmano MK, Cheng JO, Cheung SH, Woo J. Social vulnerability index for the older people—Hong Kong and New York city as examples. Journal of Urban Health. 2014; 91(6):1048-64. [DOI:10.1007/s11524-014-9901-8] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1007/s11524-014-9901-8]
7. Roudi F, Azadi P, Mesgaran M. Iran's population dynamics and demographic window of opportunity. Serra Mall, Stanford: Stanford University; 2017.
8. Wakui T, Agree EM, Saito T, Kai I. Disaster preparedness among older Japanese adults with long-term care needs and their family caregivers. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness. 2017; 11(1):31-8. [DOI:10.1017/dmp.2016.53] [PMID] [DOI:10.1017/dmp.2016.53]
9. Evans J. Mapping the vulnerability of older persons to disasters. International Journal of Older People Nursing. 2010; 5(1):63-70. [DOI:10.1111/j.1748-3743.2009.00205.x] [PMID] [DOI:10.1111/j.1748-3743.2009.00205.x]
10. Morrow BH. Community resilience: A social justice perspective. Washington: Community & Regional Resilience Initiative; 2008. [DOI:10.13140/RG.2.1.1278.9604]
11. Birkmann J. Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: Toward disaster resilient societies. Tokyo: United Nations University Press; 2006. [PMCID] [PMCID]
12. Winchester P. Power, choice and vulnerability: A case study in disaster mismanagement in South India. Abingdon: Routledge; 2014. [DOI:10.4324/9781315073590] [DOI:10.4324/9781315073590]
13. Wisner B. Risk reduction indicators. Princeton: TRIAMS Working Paper; 2006.
14. Parida PK. The social construction of gendered vulnerability to tsunami disaster: The case of coastal Sri Lanka. Journal of Social and Economic Development. 2015; 17(2):200-22. [DOI:10.1007/s40847-015-0019-y] [DOI:10.1007/s40847-015-0019-y]
15. Stough LM, Kang D. The Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction and persons with disabilities. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science. 2015; 6(2):140-9. [DOI:10.1007/s13753-015-0051-8] [DOI:10.1007/s13753-015-0051-8]
16. Birkman, J. Indicators and criteria for measuring vulnerability: Theoretical bases and requirements. Measuring vulnerability to Natural Hazards: Towards Disaster Resilient Societies. Tokyo: United Nations University; 2006. [PMID]
17. Rodgers BT, Knafl KA. Integrative literature reviews for the development of concepts: Foundations, techniques and applications. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 2000
18. Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2005; 52(5):546-53. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x] [PMID] [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x]
19. Tapsell SM, McCarthy S, Faulkner H, Alexander M. Social Vulnerability and Natural Hazards. The Burroughs, London: Iddlesex University; 2010.
20. Gronlund CJ, Berrocal VJ, White-Newsome JL, Conlon KC, O'Neill MS. Vulnerability to extreme heat by socio-demographic characteristics and area green space among the elderly in Michigan, 1990-2007. Environmental Research. 2015; 136:449-61. [DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2014.08.042] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2014.08.042]
21. Mavhura E, Manyena B, Collins AE. An approach for measuring social vulnerability in context: The case of flood hazards in muzarabani district, zimbabwe. Geoforum. 2017; 86:103-17. [DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.09.008] [DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.09.008]
22. Singh SR, Eghdami MR, Singh S. The concept of social vulnerability: A review from disasters perspectives. International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Studies. 2014; 1(6):71-82.
23. Rhoades JL, Gruber JS, Horton B. Developing an in-depth understanding of elderly adult's vulnerability to climate change. The Gerontologist. 2017; 58(3):567-77. [DOI:10.1093/geront/gnw167] [PMID]
24. Cutter SL, Emrich CT, Webb JJ, Morath D. Social vulnerability to climate variability hazards: A review of the literature. Final Report to Oxfam America. 2009; 5:1-44.
25. Rufat S, Tate E, Burton CG, Maroof AS. Social vulnerability to floods: Review of case studies and implications for measurement. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2015; 14:470-86. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.09.013] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.09.013]
26. Dunning CM, Durden SE. Social vulnerability analysis: A comparison of tools. Washington: Institute for Water Resources; 2013.
27. Doppler JV. Gender and Tsunami (Doctoral dissertation, uniwien) [MSc. thesis]. Vienna: University of Vienna; 2009.
28. Barusch AS. Disaster, vulnerability, and older adults: Toward a social work response. Journal of Gerontological Social Work. 2011; 54(4):347-50. [DOI:10.1080/01634372.2011.58282] [PMID] [DOI:10.1080/01634372.2011.582821] [PMID]
29. Kim H, Zakour M. Disaster preparedness among older adults: Social support, community participation, and demographic characteristics. Journal of Social Service Research. 2017; 43(4):498-509. [DOI:10.1080/01488376.2017.1321081] [DOI:10.1080/01488376.2017.1321081]
30. Guillard-Gonçalves C, Cutter SL, Emrich CT, Zêzere JL. Application of Social Vulnerability Index (SoVI) and delineation of natural risk zones in Greater Lisbon, Portugal. Journal of Risk Research. 2015; 18(5):651-74. [DOI:10.1080/13669877.2014.910689]
31. Marshall Jr, Mathews S. Disaster preparedness for the elderly: An analysis of international literature using symbolic interactionist perspective. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing. 2010; 2(2):79-92.
32. Paul SK. Vulnerability concepts and its application in various fields: A review on geographical perspective. Journal of Life and Earth Science. 2014; 8(2013):63-81. [DOI:10.3329/jles.v8i0.20150] [DOI:10.3329/jles.v8i0.20150]
33. Bakhshipour RA, Peyrovi H, Abedian A. [Investigating relationship between satisfaction with life and social support with mental health among freshman students of Tehran university (Persian)]. The Quarterly Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health. 2006; 7(27-28):145-52
34. Alexander D. Models of social vulnerability to disasters. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais. 2012; 4(4):21-40.
35. Jogia J, Kulatunga U, Yates GP, Wedawatta G. Culture and the psychological impacts of natural disasters: Implications for disaster management and disaster mental health. Built and Human Environment Review. 2014; 7(1):1.
36. Leon D, Villagran JC. Vulnerability: A conceptual and methodological review institute of environment and human security. Tokyo: United Nations University Press; 2006.
37. Fernandez LS, Byard D, Lin CC, Benson S, Barbera JA. Frail elderly as disaster victims: Emergency management strategies. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine. 2002; 17(2):67-74. [DOI:10.1017/S1049023X00000200] [PMID] [DOI:10.1017/S1049023X00000200]
38. Ciurean RL, Schröter D, Glade T. Conceptual frameworks of vulnerability assessments for natural disasters reduction. InApproaches to disaster management. London: IntechOpen; 2017. [DOI: 10.5772/55538] [DOI:10.5772/55538]
39. Soltani Nejad A, Barshan A, Baniasad A, Soltani Nejad A, Sam A, Sadie A. [Investigating social vulnerability of the elderly in the earthquakes of Bam, Varzaghan, and Ahar (Persian)]. Iranian Journal of Ageing, 2017; 12(3):360-371. [DOI:10.21859/sija.12.3.360] [DOI:10.21859/sija.12.3.360]
40. Gautam D. Assessment of social vulnerability to natural hazards in Nepal. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2017; 17(12):2313-20. [DOI:10.5194/nhess-17-2313-2017] [DOI:10.5194/nhess-17-2313-2017]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |