Volume 5, Issue 1 (Autumn 2019)                   HDQ 2019, 5(1): 19-24 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mahdavian M, Zolala F, Hosseinnejad M. Short Communication: Discrepancies of Disaster Tasks Performance Amongst Health Sectors in Iran. HDQ. 2019; 5 (1) :19-24
URL: http://hdq.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-248-en.html
1- Modeling in Health Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
2- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran. , zolalafarzaneh@gmail.com
3- Department of Health , Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Islamic Azad University, Kerman Branch, Kerman, Iran..
Full-Text [PDF 514 kb]   (426 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1273 Views)
Full-Text:   (242 Views)
1. Introduction
The lack of sufficient preparedness and response activities increase the vulnerability to disasters [1]. One of the key elements for proper preparation in disasters is the organizations’ awareness about their own and other involved organizations’ tasks. Awareness can help the involved bodies how to react and contact with others [2]. In addition to awareness, organizations need to have specialized knowledge, skills, [3] planning, and coordination in disaster and emergencies [4].
Having guidelines and planning are essential for a good level of awareness. The guideline will make the organizations and community able how to cooperate during the disaster response phase. In addition, the guideline can identify and define which organization undertakes the specific tasks and which one has its own potential, and also it clarify the common goals between the involved bodies. One of the advantages of planning is making the organizations ensure  of their common goals [5]. Without disaster plans or when the disaster planning is not announced properly, it can lead to potential confusion about the overall response plan and goals [6].
Owing to the emerging nature of the disaster, sometimes the members’ organizations encounter non-routine tasks and they are likely to ask who is really responsible for such tasks? This uncertainty leads to response failure in the disaster situations [7, 8]. In addition, other factors such as lack of coordination of organizations, competition for limited facilities [9], insufficient training of member’s organizations, and failure of leadership in response phase contribute to uncertainty in the disaster context [4].
Iran locates in the Middle East region which is exposed to several man-made and natural disasters [10]. Between 1900 to 2014, 353 disasters occurred in Iran caused 161,470 deaths and affected more than 44 million Iranian lives [11]. One of the destructive disasters was the Bam earthquake in Kerman city, which occurred in 2003 resulting in more than 30,000 deaths and injuring over [12]. To the best of our knowledge, there was no clear pre-defined guideline and policy about the tasks in disaster situation in Iran; however, lack of scientific studies to explore the details about it is another of unavailable references. 
The aim of this study is to clarify if the disparities and dis-coordination happened in emergent tasks in Bam earthquake from the viewpoints of members of Red organization and Kerman University of medical sciences (two principal actors in response to the Bam earthquake), such studies could help plan future reactions and strategies in case of disasters in developing countries especially in low resource areas.
2. Materials and Methods 
Study setting 
During any disaster in Iran two major organizations including; Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MOHME) local representative as medical sciences universities and Red Crescent are mainly engaged with treatment and help of victims in charge of providing national and international humanitarian assistance including nutrition, livelihoods security, while MOHME is the main health care delivery service. Bam city is situated in southeastern Iran, which is one of the major cities of Kerman province at the time of the earthquake in 2003, the population was 400000 people before the earthquake and by the last census in 2016 the population was 228241 people [11].
Sampling and data collection
During January and February 2017, we conducted this study through snowball sampling from the members of two key Organizations-Red Crescent and Kerman University of medical Sciences- involving in Bam earthquake. Finally, there were in total 30 members were invited and interviewed. (16 members of Red Crescent organization and 14 members Kerman University of medical sciences). We stopped interviewing after saturation of responses which was satisfied by the 30th person.
At the first phase investigators conducted exploratory interviews in which participants were asked to identify emergent tasks, whether it was responsible organizations for these tasks or not in Bam earthquake. This type of interviews is applied when there is no clear information about the subject of the study [13, 14]. The emergent tasks were defined the tasks emerged during the disaster response phase which were not defined and anticipated beforehand [7]. 
After recording and transcribing the interviews, the authors extracted emergent tasks which had disparities and dis-coordination about who was the real responsible of them according to the participants’ responses. These tasks were burry corpses, and the management of received national and international aids such as medical facilities, heating devices and any other aids which was needed for the victims of the earthquake (management aids). Then a questionnaire was prepared in which these emergent tasks and the responsible organizations (Appendix 1) in Bam earthquake were mentioned.
At the next phase, firstly interviewer explained the objective of the study and questionnaire guideline. The trained interviewer was available to answer any questions during filling the questionnaire.
 The interviewees were asked to fill the Self-administered questionnaire and identified that whether it was a specific organization responsible for emergent tasks or not. For validity of the questions content, validity was tested through obtaining opinion of experts. Then, questions were scored by experts. The value of CVR  and CVI  was 0.6 and 0.8, respectively, thus the content validity of questions was acceptable [15]. 
Analysis
The R programming V. 3.1.2 software was used and were employed the package 'network' for social network analysis and plotting which organizations involved in the specific tasks. In these graphs, the organizations which participated in the mentioned tasks were connected with an arrow to mentioned tasks. The organizations which did not involve in any tasks were isolated organizations. Also, the abbreviations of organizations; the complete name of these organizations was listed in the Appendix 1.
3. Results
We found that two major emergent tasks reported by participants including burry corpses and management of aid. They indicated that these tasks were emerging tasks which were a barrier for them for being aware of the responsibilities of the organization.  Most of the organizations were involved in mentioned tasks without predefined agreement and guidelines, resulting in an insufficient response.
Bury corpses
Toward the buried corpses, members of Red Crescent mentioned governorship, Kerman University of medical sciences, and themselves as responsible organizations for undertaking this responsibility (Figure 1). From the view point of Kerman university of medical sciences members, six organizations mentioned as the following: governorship, Kerman University of medical sciences, Red Crescent, Military Army,  Municipality and other organizations  (Figure 2).
Management of the aids 
The members of Red Crescent mentioned that all organizations in Bam earthquake involved in the managements of received national and international aids (Figure 3). Similarly, from the view point of Kerman University of Medical Sciences members all organizations cooperated for this responsibility, except one of them (Figure 4).
4. Discussion
The importance of task separation and anticipate the vital ones are obvious in disaster for having effective responses between organizations [1]. We showed that any definite agreement was available among involved organizations, since planning a protocol for urgent tasks is trivial.
In our study, although some organizations involved in the buried the corpses which were an emergent task, there was no predefined protocol for it. In disaster context, some tasks emerged during response phase. For instance, After the Ocean Tsunami in India, the emergent task of municipality was burying the dead bodies and was inconsistent with the routine responsibility of municipal authorities. Also, in this disaster fire personnel engaged in the burying and handling dead bodies which were emergent and non-regular tasks [16]. Also, in some disaster situation in Africa a group of non-health care volunteer workers managed the dead bodies which was emergent tasks for them [17].
Another study indicated that in Hurricane Katrina’s some paramedics engaged in the filling the vacuum while this task was not predicted before for them as a defined task and they did not have any experience about it [18]. According to pan American Health Organization and World Health Organization Manual, the Emergency Operations Committee of a country should be responsible for the management of dead bodies; otherwise a predefined organization should undertake this task such as health ministry [19].
According to management of received national and international aids, in our study, there was no consistency between involved organizations about the definite responsible and proper response which increased the vulnerability to disasters. Effective management and coordination between different organizations in disaster situations is critical because without these factors different actors would not be able to deliver the aids properly. A good example of this is Haiti earthquake in which organizations had a competition for distributing the facilities and this created disparity about definite responsible about this task [20]. 
Also, some times the involved organizations in distributing the facilities could not be able to cooperate with each other effectively owing to the sheer number of agencies and feeling that the other organization may jeopardize their freedom [21-23].
In disaster situation for good management of resources organizations must select the members who have the ability for effective cooperation with each other and with the members of other organizations. Lack of coordination between organizations, problems in exchange resources between organizations is the results of lack of standard in plans and guideline [24]. 
5. Conclusion
In order to effective response to the disaster situation, there should be adequate coordination between organizations involved in disaster response phase. Also, all the organization should be aware of their responsibilities according to the emergent tasks for effective response. In this study, there was not predefined agreement about the responsible organization and the emergent tasks including: bury corpses and management of aids which made proper response to the disaster more difficult.
Limitations
However, our study revealed issues that were not addressed before; we acknowledge there are some limitations with it. The earthquake occurred over a decade ago and recalls bias may be a possible limitation, all the participants claimed that the severity of the disaster makes the involved people ruminate the goings-on, since this disaster was hardly to forget. Also, we failed to contact participants who involved national and international organizations for gaining a more comprehensive understanding of the problem.
Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines
Ethics approval was received from Kerman University of Medical Sciences Ethic Committee. The participants voluntarily took part in the study and their responses were based on informed consent. Participants’ responses were not shared with other participants. Also, they could skip any question they felt uncomfortable with or stop the interview whenever they desired. All interviewees consented to the recording of their interview. Data were coded and kept on a password-secured desktop computer, and all audio files were destroyed two weeks after the final analysis. 
Funding
The authors did not receive any funding for this study.
Authors' contributions
Designing the study, data analysis: Mina Mahdavian, Farzaneh Zolala; data collection: Maryam Hosseinnejad; Drafting the manuscript: All authors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the members of Kerman University of medical sciences and Red Crescent for their participation.

References
Thompson D. Building effectiveness in multi-state disaster management systems: The case of the caribbean disaster and emergency response agency: The Pennsylvania State University. 2010.
Chou JS, Wu JH. Success factors of enhanced disaster resilience in urban community. Natural hazards. 2014; 74(2):661-86. [DOI:10.1007/s11069-014-1206-4]
Gudi A, Xia W, Becerra-Fernandez I. When things go right in disasters:The moderating effect of specific knowledge on task performance. International Journal of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management. 2018; 10(2):1-27. [DOI:10.4018/IJISCRAM.2018040101]
Frazmand A. Hurricane Katrina, the Crisis of Leadership, and Chaos Management: Time for Trying the ‘Surprise Management Theory in Action. Public Organizations Review. 2009; 9:399-412. [DOI:10.1007/s11115-009-0099-2]
Jordan LE . A prospective for disaster recovery: Guidelines and Strategies. Boulder: Colorado Technical University; 2011.
LeClerc C. Are disaster response plans used during the initial of a disaster response: A case study of the implementation of the sheltering plan during hurricane sandy [MSc. thesis].     Long Beach: California State University; 2015.
Rocha J. A study on uncertain dynamic disaster management tasks, knowledge sharing, and task performance [PhD. dissertation]. California: Florida International University; 2011. [DOI:10.25148/etd.FI11081002]
Hooshangi N, Alesheikh AA. Agent-based task allocation under uncertainties in disaster environments: An approach to interval uncertainty. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2017; 24:160-71. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.06.010]
Jiang Y, Yuan Y. Emergency logistics in a large-scale disaster context: Achievements and challenges. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(779):1-23. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph16050779] [PMID] [PMCID]
Ryan J, Seyedin H , Keshtgar M. Disaster management planning for health organizations in a developing country. Urban Planning Development. 2010; 137(1):77-81. [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000045]
Prevention Web. Tehran, Tehran (Iran, Islamic Rep of): Local progress report on the implementation of the HFA and 10 Essentials for Making Cities Resilient (2013-2014) [Internet]. 2014 [Updated 2014].  Available from: http://preventionweb.net/go/40110
Statistical center of Iran. Population and Housing Censuses of 2016 [Internet]. 2016 [Updated 2020 May 09]. Available from: https://www.amar.org.ir/english/Population-and-Housing-Censuses
Earl B. The practice of social research. Belmont CA: Thompson - Wadsworth; 2007.
Shield PM, Rangarjan N. A playbook for research methods: Integrating conceptual frameworks and project management. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press; 2013.
Polit DF, Beck B, Owen SV. Is the cvi an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and Recommendations Research in Nursing & Health. 2007; 30:459-67. [DOI:10.1002/nur.20199] [PMID]
Shireen H. Emergent phenomena in india after the indian ocean tsunami. Stillwater: Oklahoma State University; 2006.
Cordner S, Ellingham STD. Two halves make a whole: Both first responders and experts are needed for the management and identification of the dead in large disasters. Forensic Science International. 2017; 279:60-4. [DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.07.020] [PMID]
Majchrzak A, Jarvenpaa SL, Hollingshead AB. Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters. Organization Science. 2007; 18(1):147-61. [DOI:10.1287/orsc.1060.0228]
Morgan O, Tidball-Binz M, Alphen DV. Management of dead bodies after disasters. Washington: Pan American Health Organization; 2006.
Holguín-Verasa J, Jallerb M, Wachtendorfc T. Comparative performance of alternative humanitarian logistic structures after the Port-au-Prince earthquake: ACEs, PIEs, and CANs. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2012; 46(10):1623-40. [DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2012.08.002]
Tatham P, Rietjens SB. Integrated disaster relief logistics: A stepping stone towards viable civil military networks. Disasters. 2016; 40(1):7-25. [DOI:10.1111/disa.12131] [PMID]
Nepal. Army. The nepalese army in the aftermath of the gorkha earthquake of 2015 (experiences and lessons learned). Kathmandu: Nepalese Army; 2016.
Boersma FK, Ferguson JE, Mulder F, Wolbers JJ. Humanitarian response coordination and cooperation in Nepal. Coping with challenges and dilemmas. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; 2016.
Leeuw S De, Vis IFA, Jonkman SN. Logistics aspects of emergency preparedness in flood disaster prevention. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; 2009.
Type of Study: short communication | Subject: General
Received: 2019/02/12 | Accepted: 2019/10/9 | Published: 2020/04/8

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb