چکیده: (3 مشاهده)
Background: Persons with disabilities face disproportionately higher risks of injury, death, and exclusion during disasters. Despite global commitments to inclusion, current disaster risk reduction (DRR) strategies often remain top-down, overlooking the vital expertise and specific needs of disabled individuals.
Objective: This policy brief examines the gap between inclusive rhetoric and practical implementation in DRR. It advocates for a systematic shift toward participatory co-design as the most effective approach to safeguarding the rights and safety of persons with disabilities in emergencies.
Methods: Drawing on recent empirical studies and evidence from disaster contexts, this brief analyzes the limitations of non-consultative planning, untrained responders, and standardized aid. It introduces a participatory framework that positions persons with disabilities as essential partners in DRR planning, implementation, and evaluation.
Results: Evidence confirms that meaningful involvement of Disabled People’s Organizations (DPOs) leads to more accessible, context-sensitive, and sustainable DRR interventions. Without this engagement, policies and practices risk being ineffective or even harmful.
Conclusion: We propose three actionable recommendations: institutionalize DPO representation in DRR governance; fund co-developed training programs for emergency responders; and enforce co-created accessibility standards. Integrating lived experience is not merely an ethical obligation—it is a strategic necessity to build equitable, effective, and resilient disaster management systems.
Objective: This policy brief examines the gap between inclusive rhetoric and practical implementation in DRR. It advocates for a systematic shift toward participatory co-design as the most effective approach to safeguarding the rights and safety of persons with disabilities in emergencies.
Methods: Drawing on recent empirical studies and evidence from disaster contexts, this brief analyzes the limitations of non-consultative planning, untrained responders, and standardized aid. It introduces a participatory framework that positions persons with disabilities as essential partners in DRR planning, implementation, and evaluation.
Results: Evidence confirms that meaningful involvement of Disabled People’s Organizations (DPOs) leads to more accessible, context-sensitive, and sustainable DRR interventions. Without this engagement, policies and practices risk being ineffective or even harmful.
Conclusion: We propose three actionable recommendations: institutionalize DPO representation in DRR governance; fund co-developed training programs for emergency responders; and enforce co-created accessibility standards. Integrating lived experience is not merely an ethical obligation—it is a strategic necessity to build equitable, effective, and resilient disaster management systems.
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
