Volume 10, Issue 1 (Autumn 2024)                   Health in Emergencies and Disasters Quarterly 2024, 10(1): 21-28 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.USWR.REC.1402.228


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Soltani A, Nikseresht M, Rajabpour M, Khoundabi B. The Knowledge of Safe Emergency Evacuation During an Earthquake Among the Residents of Tehran, Iran. Health in Emergencies and Disasters Quarterly 2024; 10 (1) :21-28
URL: http://hdq.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-604-en.html
1- Health in Emergency and Disaster Research Center, Social Health Research Institute, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Disaster Management, Faculty of Social Sciences, AJA University of Command and Staff, Tehran, Iran. , Erfan_ilia_102@yahoo.com
3- Department of Management, Faculty of Social Sciences, AJA University of Command and Staff, Tehran, Iran.
4- Iran-Helal Institute of Applied-Science and Technology, Red Crescent Society of Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Full-Text [PDF 927 kb]   (252 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (801 Views)
Full-Text:   (132 Views)
Introduction 
Natural disasters such as earthquakes threaten large parts of Iran and this country is the third most affected country by destructive earthquakes in recent years after China and Indonesia, accounting for 8 of all destructive earthquakes. Tehran, the capital of Iran and one of the largest cities in the Middle East, is one of 20 most earthquake-prone megacities in the world [1-3]. Appropriate behavior or response of people during an earthquake, i.e. appropriate placement and safe evacuation, are the most effective responses that can significantly reduce the loss of life in the event of destructive earthquakes. It is recommended that people move to a suitable and safe place as soon as the earthquake starts. In a suitable place, people should protect their heads and bodies from possible injuries caused by falling ceilings, walls, and objects. When the shaking stops, they should leave the building immediately, which is called an emergency evacuation. Proper emergency evacuation during and after the end of the earthquake is one of the most important factors in reducing damage and casualties [4, 5].
For community resilience and disaster management planning, it is necessary to use appropriate information, models, and structures. In this context, it is necessary to survey peoples’ perceptions to find ways to reduce the above-mentioned damages [6-8]. There are no studies on measuring the knowledge of appropriate behaviors or responses in people during an earthquake in Tehran, although there are studies on the resilience, preparedness, and awareness of earthquakes. Farzanegan et al. found that over 50% of people did not have sufficient disaster knowledge. Based on their survey, household income, fear of natural disasters, trust in the responsible organizations, perceived frequency of natural disasters, employment, and participation in educational courses are positively related to people’s disaster literacy level [9]. Jahangiri et al. investigated the factors affecting the earthquake preparedness of people in Tehran and suggested that the number of damages can be significantly reduced by acquiring preparedness skills. They assessed people’s knowledge, attitude, and practice and investigated their educational needs and requirements. Their study showed that retired and unemployed people, housewives, elderly people, illiterate and low-educated people, and large families had a lack of adequate knowledge and needed education [10]. Taghvaei et al. found that the disaster resilience of schools in Isfahan is very low. They are vulnerable and are in an unfavorable situation [11].
Planning for the institutionalization of safe behaviors for vulnerable communities requires proper knowledge and attitudes. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the extent to which the citizens of Tehran know how to leave their houses safely during an earthquake. Their knowledge was analyzed based on some demographic factors including age, gender, occupation, educational, and place of residence. The results can be useful for preventing or reducing possible damages caused by earthquakes in Tehran.

Materials and Methods 
This is a cross-sectional study. The study population consists of all residents of Tehran in 2022 who had at least 15 years of age. Based on the central limit theorem, the sampling distribution of the mean is normally distributed with 25 samples. Therefore, the required sample size was estimated to be at least 550. A stratified random sampling method was used to select the samples. Each district was considered a stratum. In each district, five neighborhoods were selected as clusters using a table of random numbers. From the first main street of each neighborhood, five alleys with even numbers were selected. Participants were recruited from among those living in the fifth house number of each alley. Finally, 602 samples were included in the study. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Data collection was done using a researcher-made questionnaire in Persian (Table 1) which measures the knowledge of safest places and safe evacuation during an earthquake. It was designed according to the opinions of 13 experts in disaster management and earthquake response training. The questionnaire had 20 items. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed based on a content validity ratio of 0.69. The reliability was evaluated by distributing the questionnaire among 30 samples and calculating the Cronbach’s α, which showed a value of 0.702, indicating an acceptable reliability. The correct answers to each question had 1 point, while the wrong answers had 0 points. Therefore, the total score ranges from 0 to 20. 




Statistical analysis
Collected data were entered into SPSS software, Version 26 for analysis. The quantitative variables were expressed using Mean±SD and qualitative variables were expressed using frequency and percentage. The normality of the data was examined by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. T-test or the Mann-Whitney U test was used for finding the difference in variables between the two groups. Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were used for finding the difference in categorical variables between the two groups, if necessary. ANOVA or Kruskal Wallis test was used for comparing quantitative variables within more than two groups. The significance level was set at 0.05. 

Results
Among 602 participants, there were 301(50.0%) males and 301(50.0%) females. Table 2 summarizes the demographic information of all participants. The total mean score of the knowledge scale regarding emergency evacuation during an earthquake was 8.8±3.2, out of 20. It was found that 157 citizens (26.1%) did not have any source of knowledge for the emergency evacuation during the earthquake. Among the sources of information, radio and TV programs had the most important role (33.6%) followed by educational textbooks (14.1%) and educational programs prepared by the municipality (13.1%). The score of the participants who had obtained relevant information from educational programs prepared by the municipality or educational textbooks were higher than that obtained from other sources. The mean knowledge scores based on different demographic variables are presented in Table 2



Figure 1 shows the rate of correct answers to the questions. The items 13, 3, and 18 which were about the safe places in the house, self-protection, and helping others after the end of the earthquake, respectively, had the highest correct answers (79.9%, 78.2%, and 69.9%, respectively). On the other hand, the percentage of correct answers to items 11, 10, and 19 were low (9.3%, 9.5%, and 14.1%, respectively). These questions were about the correct reaction in case of being in the basement, using a wheelchair, and familiarity with the “triangle of life” theory.
In comparing the knowledge scores between males and females, the results showed that females had significantly higher knowledge of emergency evacuation than males (P<0.05). This difference was also significant in terms of occupation (P<0.05). Also, those aged 45-64 years had the highest knowledge score (9.2±3.4), followed by the age groups 25-44 and 15-24 years. Therefore, the knowledge of emergency evacuation increases with ageing. 



The ANOVA test results showed a significant difference the knowledge score of participants in terms of the educational level; those with higher educational levels had higher knowledge scores, and illiterate people had lower knowledge scores (P<0.001). Those with no occupation (college/school students, housekeepers) and employed people had a higher knowledge score compared to unemployed people (P<0.001). The knowledge score of those who had obtained relevant information from municipality educational programs or educational textbooks had higher knowledge scores (P=0.026).
The total mean score of knowledge for emergency evacuation during an earthquake was also compared based on the living district (Figure 2). There was a statistically significant difference in the knowledge score based on the district (P=0.042). The districts 4, 1, and 2 in Tehran which are privileged urban areas, ranked first to third in this regard, with mean scores of 11.6, 11.0, and 10.4, respectively




Discussion
Unsafe evacuation is the main reason for earthquake-related injuries. In this study, we aimed to determine the knowledge of safe emergency evacuation during an earthquake in citizens of Tehran. We assessed their proper behaviors in taking a safe position and finding a safe exit. Our results showed that the knowledge of citizens in Tehran was below the mean score of 10. This result is consistent with other related studies that showed the low knowledge score of people during earthquakes [7, 12, 14-17]. Farzanegan et al. in a study to assess the disaster literacy of citizens in Tehran found that over 50% of people had inadequate disaster literacy [9]. Rakhshani et al. also highlighted the low earthquake preparedness in Fars Province of Iran [18]. Disaster management planners in Iran should pay attention to the disaster risk perception of people.
The knowledge score was higher in females than in males. This indicates that women take more time to learn and are more sensitive to earthquake related issues. Urban planners in Iran should therefore pay attention to men’s low knowledge of safe emergency evacuation during an earthquake and encourage women to have a role in improving the related knowledge of family members. Our study showed that the knowledge of citizens increased with ageing and this increase continued until the age of 65. After this age, the related knowledge decreased. This is consistent with studies conducted by Farzanegan et al., Taghvaei and Jovzi Khameslouei, and Jahangiri et al. [9-11]. Considering the upward trend of aging in Iranian population and the greater vulnerability of older people, planning educational programs for older people should be one of the priorities of planners in Iran.
The results of some studies on the knowledge level in schools have shown that school students have low knowledge of earthquakes [11, 12, 16]. This is consistent with our findings and seems to be due to the lack of practical training for students. There is a need to pay more attention to the educational materials of programs for students. In recent years, earthquake preparedness maneuvers have been conducted in some schools in Iran. However, the number of maneuvers is low; it is necessary to hold more training programs in schools (at least once a month or every three months).
We found a significant difference in safe emergency evacuation knowledge between people with different educational levels. The knowledge level was not high even in those with high academic education such as a PhD. Arab et al. investigated the level of preparedness in dealing with unexpected incidents in one of the selected hospitals in Tehran. Their results showed that the level of preparedness in medical staff was at a moderate level. Arab et al. showed that, despite having a high level of education, the earthquake knowledge of managers was very low [19]. Our results support their findings as the knowledge score of participants in the present study was lower than average score 10. Therefore, considering the various occupations of educated people, providing educational materials can help increase the knowledge of people. Farzanegan et al. and Jahangiri et al. showed that employment and participation in continuing education courses are positively associated with people’s level of knowledge about natural disasters [9, 10] which is consistent with our results. Kianmehr et al. reported that physicians’ knowledge of disasters is not sufficient [20]. Therefore, the job diversity of people should be considered when developing earthquake-related educational packages. 
Our results showed that radio/TV program was the most common source of emergency evacuation education for citizen in Tehran. A related study reported the role of social media in earthquake [21]. These media outlets need to take more action to develop earthquake damage mitigation programs. Due to the popularity of cell phones, it is also advisable to use this platform for public education. The emergency evacuation knowledge scores of people that had received relevant information from the training programs prepared by the Tehran municipality and educational textbooks were higher than that obtained from other sources. The value of scientific resources is clear, but these findings show that in large cities such as Tehran, urban and municipal management programs are of great importance. Considering the responsibility of the Iranian Red Crescent Society (IFRC) in public education, it is necessary to investigate the reasons for the low role of this organization in providing emergency evacuation education to people. The collaboration of this organization with the Tehran municipality can be very helpful in this field. 
Finally, we found that the knowledge score was higher in people from privileged urban areas compared to people from other areas in Tehran. This finding, which is consistent with Farzanegan et al.’s findings related to the role of household income level, indicates that relief from livelihood concerns facilitates the ability to pay attention to other things in life, including disaster preparedness [9]. Given the greater vulnerability of people from low-income neighborhoods, it is important to provide appropriate educational programs to them. The city size and population density were the most important limitations of the study, which made sampling difficult. By using stratified random sampling method, we overcame these limitations.

Conclusion
The knowledge of safe emergency evacuation during an earthquake in citizens of Tehran, Iran, is not at appropriate level. Formal education in schools/universities alone does not improve citizens’ disaster preparedness; they need specific training programs in this field in other places such as military or health centers, government organizations, and community centers. Planning in this field should be attractive to motivate citizens to be more concerned about the earthquake preparedness. Such plans need to be targeted to low-income households by the cooperation of all responsible organizations. The use of social media is recommended for effective communication and development of public education in the field of earthquake preparedness.

Ethical Considerations

Compliance with ethical guidelines

All participants were provided with information about the study objectives and methods, before the study. The participants were assured of the confidentiality of their information and were free to leave the study at time.

Funding
This research did not receive any grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or non-profit sectors.

Authors' contributions 
Conceptualization, and supervision: Ahmad Soltani, and Majid Rajabpour; Data collection: Mohammad Nikseresht; Methodology and data analysis: Batoul Khoundabi; Investigation and writing: All authors.

Conflict of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all participants for their cooperation in this research.




References
  1. EM-DAT. The International Disaster Database, Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED). Wallonia: Université Catholique de Louvain; 2021. [Link]
  2. Soltani A, Alaedini F, Shamspour N, Ahmadi Marzaleh M. Hazard assessment of Iran Provinces based on the Health Ministry Tool in 2019. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. 2021; 23(1):e204. [Link]
  3. Kamranzad F, Memarian H, Zare M. Earthquake risk assessment for Tehran, Iran. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2020; 9(7):430. [DOI:10.3390/ijgi9070430]
  4. Shapira S, Levi T, Bar-Dayan Y, Aharonson-Daniel L. The impact of behavior on the risk of injury and death during an earthquake: a simulation-based study. Natural Hazards. 2018; 91:1059-74. [DOI:10.1007/s11069-018-3167-5]
  5. Mahdavifar MR, Izadkhah YO, Heshmati V. Appropriate and correct reactions during earthquakes: “Drop, cover and hold on” or “triangle of life”. Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering. 2009; 11(1):42-8. [Link]
  6. Khoundabi B, Soltan A. Initial steps to achieve a disaster-related statistics framework in Iran: An executive proposal. Health in Emergencies and Disasters Quarterly. 2021; 6(2):63-6. [DOI:10.32598/hdq.6.2.379.1]
  7. Myohan AZ. A study on community knowledge, attitude and practice on earthquake preparedness in nyaung U Township [MA thesis]. Kamayu: Yangon University; 2019. [Link]
  8. Çalışkan C, Üner S. Disaster literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness. 2021; 15(4):518-27. [DOI:10.1017/dmp.2020.100] [PMID]
  9. Farzanegan M, Fischer S, Noack P. Natural disaster literacy in Iran: Survey-based evidence from Tehran. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2024; 100:104204.[DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104204]
  10. Jahangiri K, Azin SA, Rahimi Forooshani A, Montazeri A. [People’s perspectives and expectations on preparedness against earthquake: Tehran case study (Persian)]. Payesh. 2011; 10(1):49-54. [Link]
  11. Taghvaei M, Jovzi Khameslouei A. [Assessment the statues of schools in district two of Isfahan city in probable disasters and emergency evacuation (Persian)]. Quarterly Journal of Environmental-based Territorial Planning (JETP). 2022; 15(56): 47-66. [Link]
  12. Ostad Taghizadeh A, Hosseini M, Navidi I, Mahaki AA, Ammari H, Ardalan A. Knowledge, attitude and practice of Tehran’s inhabitants for an earthquake and related determinants. PLoS Currents. 2012; 4:e4fbbbe1668eef. [DOI:10.1371/4fbbbe1668eef] [PMID] [PMCID]
  13. Amini Hosseini K, Izadkhah Y. From ‘earthquake and safety’ school drills to ‘safe school-resilient communities’: A continuous attempt for promoting community-based disaster risk management in Iran. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2020; 45:101512. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101512]
  14. Genc F, Yildiz S, Kaya E, Bilgili N. Disaster literacy levels of individuals aged 18-60 Years and factors affecting these levels: A web-based cross-sectional study. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2022; 76:102991. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102991]
  15. Türker A, Sözcü U. “Examining natural disaster literacy levels of pre-service geography teachers.” Journal of Pedagogical Research. 2021; 5(2):207-21. [DOI:10.33902/JPR.2021270164]
  16. Zhang D, Zhu X, Zhou Z, Xu X, Ji X, Gong A. Research on disaster literacy and affecting factors of college students in Central China. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness. 2021; 15(2):216-22. [DOI:10.1017/dmp.2020.33] [PMID]
  17. Shapira S, Aharonson-Daniel L, Bar-Dayan Y. Anticipated behavioral response patterns to an earthquake: The role of personal and household characteristics, risk perception, previous experience and preparedness. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2018; 31:1-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.04.001]
  18. Rakhshani T, Abbasi S, Ebrahimi M, Travatmanesh S. Investigating the preparedness status of households against earthquake in Fars Province in 2013; a cross sectional study. Iranian Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2016; 3(2):66-72. [DOI:10.22037/ijem.v3i2.11587]
  19. Arab M, Zeraati H, Akbari Haghighi F, Ravangard R. A study on the executive managers’ knowledge and performance, and their hospitals preparedness against earthquake events and their relationships at public hospitals affiliated by Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Health Administration. 2009; 11(34):7-14. [Link]
  20. Kianmehr N, Mofidi, M, Nejati A. Assessment of physician’s knowledge about disaster. Journal of Medical Council of Islamic Republic of Iran. 2009; 27(2):184-9. [Link]
  21. Amiresmaili M, Zolala F, Nekoei-Moghadam M, Salavatian S, Chashmyazdan M, Soltani A, et all. Role of social media in earthquake: A systematic review. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. 2021; 23(5):e447. [Link]
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Risk assessment
Received: 2024/02/5 | Accepted: 2024/04/15 | Published: 2024/10/1

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb